The most remarkable thing about WandaVision is how familiar it feels. Despite being new — it’s the first Marvel series on Disney+ and the first new Marvel anything in ages — WandaVision feels as welcoming as a beloved TV rerun.

Oh sure, there is a sinister force lurking that threatens to tear it all apart. And being a Marvel Studios production, WandaVision doesn’t commit nearly enough to the bit to say anything new about its characters or the artificiality of television. Nor is the show really weird enough. But as a playful homage to the type of TV we don’t see anymore, WandaVision is a blast that proves there’s plenty of dimensions still left to explore in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

Premiering on January 15, WandaVision throws viewers back to a bygone era when TV was appointment viewing. Elizabeth Olsen and Paul Bettany reprise their Avengers roles as the mystical Wanda Maximoff and synthetic Vision, respectively. But rather than star in a modern thriller with rudimentary plots, an impeccably costumed Olsen and Bettany ham it up in a mid-century sitcom with nods to I Love Lucy and Bewitched. (The show’s first few episodes are in black and white with 4:3 framing.) Here, in this impossible and likely false reality, Wanda and Vision are newlyweds who navigate dire challenges like nosy neighbors, playing host to Vision’s boss for dinner, and their neighborhood talent show.

It’s all very clever and immensely fun. And it succeeds by virtue of Olsen and Bettany, whose performances are so textured in this unusual framework that you can and will be fooled into thinking their big screen Marvel roles have been small screen darlings this whole time. Their screwball antics and exaggerated gestures take up the space they were denied in any of their Avengers appearances.

There were times watching WandaVision where I believed I was actually watching a lost sitcom, newly unearthed. A married witch and robot living in suburbia? That’s not any more strange than Alf.

Unfortunately, for all Bettany and Olsen give to the show and its attention to detail — WandaVision filmed in front of a live audience, and TV legend Dick Van Dyke was an unofficial consultant — the show cuts corners where it needn’t. Its biggest betrayal is in its clean, 4K resolution that betrays the immersion. Even high-definition transfers of I Love Lucy contain grain that is absent in WandaVision. This isn’t a grave sin, but when a show like WandaVision shoots for the moon, you wonder why it’s content for the stars.

Still, there hasn’t been anything like WandaVision ever, in 2021 or 1961. And for all its creeping darkness — ripped straight from its dual comic source materials of Brian Michael Bendis’ House of M and Tom King’s The Vision — WandaVision is ineffably comforting. Even if you didn’t grow up cheating bedtime to watch Nick at Nite, the tropes and aesthetics of the mid-century sitcom are so baked into our shared psyche, it’s impossible not to feel at ease watching something with a laugh track.

For years, it was TV sitcoms’ many happy families and inoffensive hijinks that kept generations heated by the warming glow of the screen. It isn’t surprising why Disney rival WarnerMedia spent an eye-watering $500 million to stream Friends. These shows worked, and they still work today.

But WandaVision isn’t aiming to enter the pantheon of endlessly rewatchable sitcoms like Friends or The Office. By the end of Episode 3 (the last one Disney provided for review), it’s clear Wanda and Vision’s world is about to get a lot less nostalgic.

As the Marvel Cinematic Universe stages its long-awaited comeback without a standard-issue Marvel blockbuster like Black Widow, The Falcon, and The Winter Soldier, or even Eternals to satiate audiences, the most daring thing about WandaVision isn’t that it’s so “weird” or “strange” — it’s that it’s comforting. Right now, maybe that’s what we need the most.

WandaVision streams January 15 on Disney+.

These are my winners for the best in physical media of 2023. As always I am limited to the titles I could personally purchase and review. 2023 was a standout year for catalog releases so this is merely my attempt to highlight important technical aspects and the hard work put in by many talented people that frequently gets overlooked. I also hope this can serve as a helpful buyer’s guide for those looking to pick up some incredible releases.

00:00 Red Carpet Nominees
05:39 Awards Start and Introduction
11:03 Best Artwork-Bruce Lee At Golden Harvest LE, Arrow
12:12 Best Steelbook or LE packaging standard release: Young Guns UHD steelbook, Lionsgate
14:23 Best Silent Film Release: TIE- The Trap, Kino. The Mystic and The Unknown, Criterion.
16:13 Best Film Restoration: Bruce Lee at Golden Harvest, Arrow
18:25 Best audio restoration: The Man Who Knew Too Much Perspecta Stereo, Universal
20:17 Best Encoding Blu-ray: The Big Gundown, Fidelity In Motion, Indicator
22:11 Best Encoding UHD: TIE-Bruce Lee At Golden Harvest, Barbarella-Arrow. Cinderella, Disney.
24:34 Best improvement using same master, Blu-ray: TIE- The Kiss Before The Mirror and The Big Gundown, Indicator.
27:09 Best improvement using same master, UHD: Touch of LE, Eureka.
28:11 Best improvement over previous flawed video masters: Bruce Lee At Golden Harvest, Arrow.
28:53 Best effort in handling multiple cuts, audio tracks and presentations. Blu-ray: The Big Gundown, Indicator.
29:04 Best effort in handling multiple cuts, audio tracks and presentations UHD: Bruce Lee At Golden Harvest, Arrow
29:35 Best Audio Commentary: TIE- David J. Skal-The Unknown, Criterion. Nora Fiore-The Kiss Before The Mirror, Indicator.
37:08 Best Supplemental Features Package-Bruce Lee At Golden Harvest, Arrow.
38:05 Best Supplemental Feature: The Final Game of Death-Bruce Lee At Golden Harvest, Arrow.
38:46 Best Documentary: The Final Game of Death-Bruce Lee At Golden Harvest, Arrow.
38:53 Special Award for Excellence in Film History Supplements: The Final Game of Death-Bruce Lee At Golden Harvest, Arrow.
41:16 Best of 2023 Awards
41:23 Best Audio Quality: Bruce Lee At Golden Harvest, Arrow.
43:30 Best Picture Quality Blu-ray: Tarzan The Ape Man, Warner Archive.
44:48 Best Picture Quality UHD: TIE- The Ranown Westerns, Criterion. Barbarella, Bruce Lee At Golden Harvest, Arrow.
49:36 Blu-ray of the Year: The Big Gundown LE, Indicator.
51:44 4K UHD of the Year: Bruce Lee At Golden Harvest, Arrow.
52:33 Best Boxset of the Year: Bruce Lee At Golden Harvest, Arrow.
53:19 Disc of the Year 2023: Bruce Lee At Golden Harvest, Arrow.
56:23 Best Labels of 2023
56:29 Best US label: Warner Archive
59:04 Best UK label: Arrow Video
01:01:35 Best Label: Arrow Video
01:02:56 Final Summary

https://vancouverpublicspace.ca/inventory/601-hastings-street-at-seymour-street-princess-plaza/

Site Name: Princess Plaza

Name and Address:

• Site Address: 601 West Hastings
• Closest Street Intersection: Hastings and Seymour
• Local Area: Downtown
• Neighbourhood: CBD
• Latitude: 49.28484963
• Longitude: -123.1128793

Photoset: https://flic.kr/s/aHsjUWissX

Description: A mixture of open-space and covered public space. The site is primarily defined by a heavy, domed structure – open at ground level. The site offers one of the few weatherproof public spaces in downtown. A significant change in grade exists between north and south ends of the site – necessitating a sizeable flight of stairs at then north end.

Components: Atrium; Edge space

Year Built: 1982

Ownership status: Private

History Notes: The atrium/plaza was built in 1982, as part of the development of the adjascent Princess Building. In 2014, a proposal was submitted to the City of Vancouver to redevelop the building into a larger office tower. This rezoning was approved in 2015.

Key Events, Usage in History, Timeline:

• 1980s – constructed
• 2008, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2014 – VPSN informal event programming to activate the space (primarily on Halloween); 2014 Rezoning application seeks to redevelop site.
• 2015 Rezoning application approved.

Locational Context: The atrium dome is located SE of the Princess Building, an 11-storey office tower. Surrounding context includes other office and retail uses. To the east: SFU’s downtown campus.

Site Orientation: Various; primarily south and east

Dimensions:

• Area: Total site: approx 600m2
• Dimensions: Total site (including dome) approx 15m x 40m

Design Features:

• Solar exposure/shading considerations: Covered space.
• Weather Proofing: Yes.
• Surface Treatment and Materials: Hard surfaced.

Furniture and Amenities:

• Formal Seating: Yes – several steel benches
• Informal Seating: Yes. Planter ledges provide additional seating. Also, stairs to the north end
• Waste or Recycling Disposal: Yes.
• Lighting: The interior of the dome is lit via 20 lights.
• Landscaping: Several large planters are built into the plaza space – helping to define the space and, through terracing, moderate the change in grade.
• Other items of note: Ash tray containers.

Security: Site has CCTV cameras inside.

Access:

• Transit: Accessible via HAstings Street bus routes. Approx 1 block south from Waterfront Station (SkyTrain, Canada Line, SeaBus).
• Universal Design: Accessible at grade along southern edge. Eastern and southern edges have stairs.

General Usage or Observational data: The space is used informally, and in relatively low numbers. Often a spot for smokers, or people taking a break.

Typology: Enclosed Space – Atrium

Evaluation Details:

• Timestamp: 24/11/2014 18:55:35
• Time of evaluation: 0.125
• Weather during evaluation: N/A

These are my awards for the worst in physical media and catalog title masters for the calendar year of 2023. There were unfortunately many compromised releases and masters but two so outshone the others that they dominate these awards: the desecration of American Graffiti and the Warner studio release of the Fleischer Superman cartoons. And the specter of James Cameron looms large…

00:00 Intro goof
00:00:32 Introduction
02:24 WTF disc of the year:
04:03 Worst artwork:
05:05 Most disappointing audio:
05:48 Worst audio:
05:56 Worst over processing of preexisting audio source:
06:33 Worst audio desecration:
07:51 Disc most ruined by no original audio:
08:21 Cheapest feeling and least effort boxset:
09:38 Worst 4K UHD picture quality:
12:04 Worst Blu-ray Picture Quality:
13:21 Worst encoding, UHD:
14:21 Worst Encoding BD:
15:12 Dumbest Encoding UHD:
15:43 Dumbest Encoding BD:
16:04 Worst HDR:
16:47 Worst Supplemental Feature:
21:54 Most problematic and error ridden disc:
23:03 Most problematic boxset:
25:00 Cheapest reissue practices:
26:17 Most annoying reissue practice:
28:36 New Low for Film Preservation: James Cameron 4K remasters
29:53 Lifetime Achievement Award for continued Video Idiocy: James Cameron
30:09 Worst UHD of the Year:
32:25 Worst Blu-ray of the Year:
33:23 Special Award for Video Incompetence-
34:38 Worst disc of the year:
36:57 Top 10 worst
37:18 #10
37:34 #9
37:55 #8
38:24 #7
39:03 #6
40:02 #5
40:48 #4
41:03 #3
42:04 #2
42:36 #1
42:58 Final Summary
45:47 Outro Goof

Women and girls experience the same general symptoms of ADHD as men and boys. However, the way the symptoms are expressed in their behaviors can appear different from their expression in men and boys.

This difference in expression has historically been one of the reasons girls and women are underdiagnosed. Clinicians, parents, and other adults who work with children look for the male model of ADHD symptoms that focuses on hyperactivity and impulsiveness. When girls demonstrate symptoms of inattention, overly sociable behavior, forgetfulness, talkativeness, or difficulties with time management, those behaviors are attributed to other causes or cultural expectations.

Symptoms of ADHD

ADHD has three main presentations: predominantly inattentive, predominantly hyperactive-impulsive, and combined inattentive and hyperactive.

Women and girls can have any of these presentations, and presentations and symptom severity can vary across their lives. However, both research and lived experience indicate that girls and women most often appear to have the inattentive presentation:

• Fails to give close attention to details or makes careless mistakes
• Has difficulty sustaining attention, does not appear to listen
• Struggles to follow through with instructions, has difficulty with organization
• Avoids or dislikes tasks requiring sustained mental effort, loses things easily
• Is easily distracted, is forgetful in daily activities

To assume that women and girls only experience the inattentive presentation would be incorrect. Many women and girls report and describe “internal” hyperactivity and other unrecognized symptoms, with behaviors often ascribed culturally to very “social” girls:

• Talks excessively
• Fidgets and often needs to get up and walk around
• Acts impulsively or speaks before thinking
• Appears to daydream but will explains that her thoughts feel like they are “going a million miles a minute” and she has trouble keeping her mind on one topic
• Easily makes friends but has difficulty sustaining friendships
• Self-harming activities, or activities that require extreme and unhealthy self-discipline
• Adopts compensatory strategies, leading to working two to three times as hard as her peers in order to be equally successful
• Fears rejection by peers or friends and clings to other people or remains in unhealthy relationships

Additional indications of ADHD

Though not often listed as symptoms, other indications of ADHD in girls and women include co-occurring depression and anxiety, difficult romantic relationships that can lead to intimate partner violence, trouble maintaining friendships, and at least one space in her life in disarray (messy house, messy bedroom, or similar personal space).

Often girls with ADHD will become sexually active at a younger age than their peers, due to impulsivity, poor planning, or a desire to be cared for by their partner. When they do so, they are at a greater risk of being pressured into unwanted sexual activity or becoming victims of sexual violence, and are less likely to use or be able to insist that their partners use contraception.